Upgrade inventory
PHP, Laravel, Composer package, extension, and deployment inventory, including abandoned or pinned dependencies that block the target version.
An unsupported runtime is not just a version number. Composer conflicts, abandoned packages, missing tests, and deployment assumptions turn a small bump into a risk the team cannot schedule. We assess the real upgrade path, then run a scoped sprint from it.
The assessment fee is credited toward the matching approved sprint. You get a written scope and quote after the assessment; work starts only after you approve it.
Prices are in USD. The sprint is quoted from the assessment findings; the amount shown is the starting point, not a fixed total.
Security patches stop, hosting providers move on, and new packages assume a runtime you do not have. The team knows the upgrade is needed; what it does not have is a credible view of what will break, what must be replaced, and how to get through it without freezing feature work.
Framework upgrades, PHP behavior changes, Composer constraints, and custom patches travel together. Missing one turns the release into a production surprise.
If the app has thin coverage, the upgrade plan has to include how the important flows will be checked before and after the cutover.
Queue workers, cron jobs, PHP extensions, and hosting configuration can fail after the code passes locally.
The assessment is a fixed-fee first step. The sprint is scoped from the evidence it produces.
PHP, Laravel, Composer package, extension, and deployment inventory, including abandoned or pinned dependencies that block the target version.
The changes that are mechanical, the ones that need code work, and the ones that need a product decision. Each has evidence, not a generic estimate.
A proposed upgrade path with checkpoints and acceptance checks, then a fixed scope for the sprint. The $1,000 assessment is credited toward it.
Dependency and framework changes, compatibility fixes, regression coverage for agreed flows, and a staged cutover with rollback notes.
The assessment is meant to expose the real work before anyone commits to a date. These items stay outside the sprint unless they are separately scoped.
You approve the written scope and quote before the upgrade sprint begins.
You tell us the current versions, the target if you have one, the business impact, and the deadline. Do not send credentials through this form.
We inspect the repository and dependency metadata through the access process you approve, then identify the blockers that actually affect the target versions.
You get the upgrade path, the risk map, the regression checks, and a written quote. The assessment fee is credited toward the approved sprint.
We make the approved changes, run the agreed checks, and document the cutover and rollback. Remaining risks are handed over explicitly.
We inspect the repository and dependency metadata through the access process you approve. Do not send credentials, secrets, or production data through this form.
Diagnose slow queries, lock contention, and unstable load before changing production.
View service →Turn a confirmed finding into a scoped fix, with verification and an independent review before completion.
View service →Find the cost drivers in your cloud bill before changing infrastructure. Qualification first, implementation only where the evidence supports it.
View service →Yes, when the assessment shows a workable path. The exact source and target versions are part of the assessment; we do not quote a major upgrade blind.
We will not pretend the tests exist. The plan includes the smallest regression checks for the flows that matter, and we agree those before the sprint.
We identify them in the assessment and give options: replace, pin, patch, or remove. Replacing a package can become a separate scope.
No. It is the starting point for the upgrade sprint. The assessment produces the scope and written quote; the $1,000 is credited toward the approved sprint.
No. The sprint is for the upgrade. Behavior changes and new features are separate work.
Yes. The scope names who changes what, and the handover notes go to whoever maintains the application.
Send the current PHP and Laravel versions, the target if you have one, and the deadline. We will reply with the assessment next step.